And now, to finish off the week, the
first in another double feature I undertook yesterday, something I
haven't done in ages. Something of note was that both films were
comedies, something I very much needed after yet another awful day at
work. I'll give my thoughts on the second comedy next time but today,
let's look at the comedy caper featuring those chowderheads, The
Three Stooges.
I haven't actually seen a lot of the
Stooges work, or much to do with them, but their influence cannot be
understated and most of us would have learned of the Stooges through
the media they've influenced (has anyone ever done a running total of
how many Stooges references show up in The Simpsons?)
I have, however, played the NES game
based on the characters, and that's a Hell of a lot of fun. It tries
something different and has neat sound effects, good stuff.
I knew that this film had a lot going
against it, too. People blasting it for taking the Stooges into the
modern world and such, and no doubt some were concerned at the acting
choices. But were they right to judge so hastily or do we have on our
hands a modern day re-imagining pulled off nicely?
The film itself is split into three
segments, but all of them relate to the main plot, which involves
Larry (Sean Hayes), Curly (Will Sasso) and Moe (Chris Diamantopoulos)
leaving the orphanage they've been a part of all their lives to raise
enough money to save it from closing. This leads to a murder attempt
they... well, attempt, when Lydia (Sofia Vergara) offers them enough
money to kill her husband.
I've long held a belief that if you're
going to remake or re-imagine something, you should take either
something that sucks and remove the bad things to make it better, or
(in the case of the Stooges) take a property from a few decades ago
and put a modern spin on it to showcase what would happen in said
franchise if they continued to this day (that's not to say I won't
watch remakes regardless, it all depends). The Three Stooges nails
that concept. I won't comment on how well it worked for the boys back
in the day, but considering all the technology and progress we've
seen happen since then, it's not like they couldn't take advantage of
it. However, what makes this film work is that even in the modern
setting, the Stooges are still the Stooges. Unlike attempts from
other classic characters to “be down with the kids” (Yo Yogi!,
anyone?), the boys haven't been changed to be “hip, cool and/or
funky”. They're not spouting “gangsta” slang or threatening to
“bust a cap in someone's ass” (do people even say that anymore?
God I'm so out of touch). So, while the world is as modern as can be,
the essence of the Stooges is locked in a time capsule, which works
out for the best. Though some of the interactions with modern day
concepts (the iPhone bit seen in one of the trailers) are hilarious,
like the Twitter remark (“I'll Tweet you” “Tweet us to
dinner?”)
That being said, there is one downside to modern day mingling, which I'll get to later.
That being said, there is one downside to modern day mingling, which I'll get to later.
But what of the Stooges themselves, how
do they fare? Wonderfully. Chris Diamantopoulos makes for a great
Moe, a no-nonsense, short-tempered but golden-hearted fellow and Sean
Hayes delivers a surprising turn as Larry, surprising because I've
never been a big fan of his work. He easily impressed me here, as the
laid-back and good natured goon. But the show stealer is easily Will
Sasso as Curly, who gets so many of his mannerisms down pat, you'd
swear he studied directly under the man himself. The classics are
there, including the “nyuk-nyuk-nyuk!”, his barking like a dog
when threatened, and my favourites “soitenly!” and the
pronunciation of circumstance as “circumstance!” His energy leaps
off the screen and he garners the most laughs.
On another note of acting, Sofia
Vergara actually made for a convincing villain. A little too
convincing... I haven't seen a whole lot of Modern Family, and I
don't know much about her character, but I have to wonder why people
are so enamored with her. Is it because of her looks? That's not
doing her a service, guys.
Going back to my point on the essence
of the Stooges, in much the same way the characters themselves
haven't been altered to suit modern times, neither has their humor.
It's still very physical, filled with pratfalls and slapstick, but
not without taking concepts literally (one of the most hilarious
things in the movie is a money making attempt involving a salmon
farm. And that leads to the boys watering salmon like they were
plants) or just with impeccably timed dialogue (before Lydia tells
the boys what they need to do for the money, Curly says “Who do we
have to moider?!”) Oh, and one of the most subtle gags involves
Curly and Larry putting up missing posters for Moe, with the line
“Answers to his name” on the bottom. Stuff like that is why I
love comedy.
But there is one thing that the film
must be penalized for, and it's not really a spoiler since it's in
one of the trailers: the addition of the Jersey Shore cast. I know
why, and I know that Moe spent a lot of the time delivering violence
unto them, but it doesn't change the fact that this film acknowledges
this existence. As far as I'm concerned, the only time they should be
on screen is if someone's filming a meteor crushing every single one
of their useless bodies into pulp. Otherwise, I don't want to be
reminded of their self absorbed, stupid nature.
If you wanted a reality TV show
experience for Moe to get involved in, why not The Amazing Race? I
can see him try and get a clue from some local by going “Wise guy,
eh?” before doing the classic eye poke and then run off with the
clue. But maybe that's just me.
In spite of that, a feel good family
fun film. Even when the violence gets to insane levels (like Curly
taking a chainsaw to the head), there's no blood, gore or anything of
that nature. The Stooges are essentially live action Rooney Tunes.
And really, what else could they be? 4/5
No comments:
Post a Comment