(Please note: the following blog was originally posted on my old blog
Why Yes I Am Quite Random, Why Do You Ask?, a blog I can no longer
access for some unknown reason. This is being put at the start of
each blog I'm uploading, in case anyone comes across the blog and
accuses me of plagiarism. This is explained further in my
introduction blog.
The following was originally posted on Tuesday, November 1st, 2011 at 6:07 pm )
It
certainly can’t have escaped anybody’s attention that zombies are
popping up in every medium not just as the stars of their own
vehicles (such as the term star can apply) but also in places we
never expected. The Bennets have a spot of bother with the undead in
the Pride And Prejudice And Zombies series (film to be expected in
2013 at this point), the pesky varmints show up in the video game Red
Dead Redemption: Undead Nightmare and even Call Of Duty has them
marching along in Call Of Duty: World At War: Zombies.
The
video game industry seems to be prevalent with zombie games and
add-ons. Series like Left 4 Dead and Dead Rising give you more
zombies than you ever thought you could imagine and the newly
released Dead Island is only adding to the trend (though it can be
argued, as it can for 28 Days Later and its sequel, that these aren’t
zombies in the traditional sense but that’s for another time).
Comic
books love to throw zombies into the mix, most likely because it
allows heroes and villains alike to use their powers, weapons and
abilities at full force without worrying about the consequences
because hey, the dead don’t have rights! Marvel Zombies, The
Walking Dead (though not a superhero comic, they are the focal point
here), even DC’s crossover event comic Blackest Night offered
something similar to zombies.
And
movies, well, there are that many films starting with the word zombie
they’re almost as overpowering and numerous as the creatures
themselves. In 2010, over 40 films about, or featuring, zombies were
made and this doesn’t include short films. Granted, a lot of those
come from countries where English is not the first language so not
many people overseas will know those films but they still count.
Arguably, the most well known releases of last year were the latest
of George A. Romero’s own zombie series, Survival Of The Dead and
Resident Evil: Afterlife
And
this is a trend that does not look like it’s dying (no pun
intended) down anytime soon. The latest Pirates Of The Caribbean
movie features zombies (and apparently vampire mermaids. I haven’t
seen it yet so I don’t know if they pull it off well); The [Rec]
series, which inspired the Quarantine series (first was a remake but
it is now going down an original path), is getting another sequel;
the aforementioned Pride And Prejudice And Zombies’ World War Z is
due next year; and there’s even a romantic zombie movie on the way
(more on that later)
Yet despite what some might see as an overcrowding of zombie related media, the question is, why is it still so popular?
Yet despite what some might see as an overcrowding of zombie related media, the question is, why is it still so popular?
I
have a theory as to why (though I acknowledge that others have
probably reached the same conclusion). Part of this theory actually
involves a comparison to vampires, so I’ll keep it as short as I
can.
Vampires
over the years have gone through several interpretations and
concepts. Different writers pick and choose parts of vampire lore
they want to use and want to ignore.
In
the 30‘s and beyond, Dracula was pretty much the first thing that
came to mind when talking about vampires. Back then, vampires were
usually treated as creatures of olden times, with olden ways and as
figures of mystery, though justifiably so.
The
Hammer films of the 50‘s and similar productions went with the idea
of vampires as seductive creatures, usually not in subtle ways and
usually with a female vampire and a female victim. Though it may have
boosted some of Hammer’s vampire films into cult status, it may
also have inadvertently planted the idea that being a vampire was
desirable. Like the other Dracula films, the standard methods for
disposing of a vampire were in place (stake to the heart,
decapitation, fire).
Others
have taken the approach that can be summed up thusly: “Duuuuuuude,
being a vampire is awesome! You can stay up all night, do whatever
you want and you’ll be young and pretty forever!” (The Lost Boys
ran on this)
Some
movies involve vampires either running the world and becoming the
dominant race and not unlike humans other than bloodlust
(Daybreakers), others involve them being societies that move amongst
humans or outnumber them but go through power struggles and wars with
other supernatural beings (the Underworld series, the Blade series)
However,
the most common depiction these days is perhaps the idea that some
vampires are tortured, lonely immortals who go through Peter
Parker-style wangst at their abilities at being both a gift and a
curse. Anne Rice’s vampires ran on the idea that they were somewhat
sexy, desirable and even somewhat charming. Some were caught up in
the ramifications of their immortality and lifestyle and often
wondered if they were dooming others. However, they are also
portrayed as hedonistic, vain, self-serving and somewhat oblivious to
the needs of others. Now, which part do you think most people attach
themselves to, hmm?
And
now we get to how vampires are mostly seen today: as the first half
of what I described of the Rice style vampires, only usually younger,
“good” vampires who like humans and fall in love at first sight
(a ridiculous concept) with teenagers. Of course, I refer to
Twilight. Since it’s still a hotly debated topic, I will refrain
from airing my personal views here, except for this: I don’t care
what people decide to ignore or add to vampires, they don’t sparkle
and they can’t give birth (and don’t tell me about Darla from
Angel, everyone on the show noted it was impossible and that’s why
it worked there!)
Though,
speaking of Angel, the vampires of the Buffyverse are probably my
favourite portrayals of vampires so far, going in-depth on the
history of vampires, how they work and such. In a nutshell, the demon
infects the body to an extent but its also influenced by who you were
before you died. Or, to look at it another way, vampires are some
humans with their conscience and inhibitions switched off. Then you
have your souled vampires, like Angel himself, who are still vampires
they just feel horribly guilty of what they’ve done (usually,
anyway).
All
sorts of aspects of vampires get thrown out and exchanged and swapped
around, from the effects of sunlight, to the weirder aspects like
“vampires cannot cross running water”, “throwing salt or seeds
over a vampire’s shoulder will cause the vampire to count each
individual grain of salt or seed” (incidentally, this is thought to
be the basis for the concept of Count Von Count from Sesame Street)
and of course, what a vampire can transform to (if they can at all).
These forms are most commonly bats or wolves but can include a form
of mist (I wish I saw that more often)
So,
for those of you who haven’t fallen asleep at this point, you may
be asking “I thought this blog was about zombies, what’s this got
to do with it?”
Well,
the answer is this: zombies have worked so far because no one’s
changed the fundamentals. Vampires undergo so many changes over the
years, from vicious monsters lacking souls to tortured, innocent
immortals to single minded feeding machines (30 Days Of Night
displays that kind of vampire).
But
zombies? Pretty much the same. In zombie games, to paraphrase Yahtzee
of Zero Punctuation, this is the basic format: “Zombies over there,
kill they ass”
About
the only aspects that become altered throughout the mediums are
whether or not they can talk (and if they can, whether or not they
maintain full vocabularies or just go with “BRRRRAAAIIINS!”) or
whether running zombies count as zombies at all (28 Days Later
sparked that particular debate). Although some debate still rages
about whether or not all flesh obsessed shamblers are zombies or just
infected people who resemble zombies.
In
any case, because the formula’s remained relatively unchanged,
zombies have carried on doing what they do and we keep lapping it up.
No tortured Romeo and Juliet style romances (yet) about zombies and
the humans who love them (now that would make for a really cool talk
show episode). No zombie version of The Road where a zombie and his
zombie son roam the post-zombie apocalyptic Earth looking for fresh
meat (or, for a twist, one of them is not a zombie and the zombie’s
memory makes them resist biting the other though the temptation is
there)
Nope,
zombies= evil and humans have to fight or flee. That’s how its been
since the beginning and that’s how it’ll be for years to come.
Or
will it?
Though
the title has not yet been decided upon (at least to my knowledge),
there actually IS a rom-zom-com in development. I don’t know
whether to praise it for trying to shake things up or be wary that
the gimmick will be stretched out. It’s one thing to have something
different, it’s another to explore what this idea can do. Merely
being different doesn’t mean anything if your entire message is
“I’m different! Look at me!”
Shaun
Of The Dead might be one of the better ideas of shaking things up a
little. It accomplishes this not by radically altering the genre but
by injecting humour into it, almost deconstructing it and lampshading
it. It’s serious in places but still humorous enough to stand out
from the crowd and be remembered not just as “that funny film about
zombies” but as something inspiring since it tried something
different and worked. Part of that is because rather than go “these
types of films are rubbish and here’s why” it’s an affectionate
funny film featuring zombies. And those are the ones that work best,
the ones that satire films or genres but make it clear all throughout
that they respect the work and love the concepts.
I
mean, it was enough to get Simon Pegg and Edgar Wright cameos for
George A. Romero’s Land Of The Dead (I believe they were even
offered meatier roles but they chose to cameo out of respect for the
works. Also, you get to be a zombie for the man considered to be the
father of the zombie. Unless you count that Smurf story where they
turn purple after being bitten but that’s yet another debate)
Maybe
the zombie craze is already dying down. All good things have to come
to an end. Are we getting sick of zombies yet?
No comments:
Post a Comment